-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
fix(types): package.loadlib return nil, err when fail
#908
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @phanen, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the type definition within the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request corrects the return type annotation for package.loadlib in the standard library definitions. The original annotation was incorrect. Your change is a good fix, but I've provided a suggestion to make the type even more accurate by considering the behavior of package.loadlib in different Lua versions (5.1 vs 5.2+), where it can return a different number of error messages on failure.
| ---@param libname string | ||
| ---@param funcname string | ||
| ---@return fun():nil | ||
| ---@return function?, string? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While this is a great improvement over the previous incorrect type, to be more precise, package.loadlib can return two error strings on failure in Lua 5.2 and later versions. On Lua 5.1, it returns one error string. To correctly type this for all versions, you can specify three optional return values. When fewer values are returned, the remaining ones will be nil, which matches the string? type.
This would make the type hint more accurate for users on modern Lua versions.
---@return function?, string?, string?
No description provided.