Refactor temperature calculation in F_BMI160.cpp#45
Open
EnderDocs wants to merge 1 commit intoLiquidCGS:mainfrom
Open
Refactor temperature calculation in F_BMI160.cpp#45EnderDocs wants to merge 1 commit intoLiquidCGS:mainfrom
EnderDocs wants to merge 1 commit intoLiquidCGS:mainfrom
Conversation
Was testing the temperature and getting 140~ when real value dropped below 23.00, the converstion itself had an issue. Tested it.
EnderDocs
commented
Dec 31, 2025
| cal->gyroBias[2] = (float)gyro_bias[2]; | ||
| cal->valid = true; | ||
| } No newline at end of file | ||
| } |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure why this is a diff, nothing changed here
Owner
|
Hey! Thanks for the PR, I'll take a closer look at this soon™ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Was testing the temperature and getting 140~ when real value dropped below 23.00, the converstion itself had an issue. Tested it.