Introduce REUSE compliance

[alganet]

This commit introduces REUSE compliance by annotating all files with SPDX information and placing the reused licences in the LICENSES folder.

We additionally removed the docheader tool which is made obsolete by this change.

The main LICENSE and copyright text of the project is now not under my personal name anymore, and it belongs to "The Respect Project Contributors" instead.

This change restores author names to several files, giving the appropriate attribution for contributions.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.77%. Comparing base (3270c1f) to head (456ec30).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1613   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     97.77%   97.77%           
  Complexity     1007     1007           
=========================================
  Files           212      212           
  Lines          2339     2339           
=========================================
  Hits           2287     2287           
  Misses           52       52           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This pull request introduces REUSE compliance to standardize licensing and copyright attribution across the project. The change replaces personal copyright claims with "The Respect Project Contributors" and implements SPDX headers throughout the codebase for better license tracking and attribution.

Changes:

• Removed the docheader tool and added REUSE compliance tooling
• Updated copyright attribution from individual name to "Respect Project Contributors"
• Added SPDX license headers to all source files and documentation

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 298 out of 1102 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
composer.json	Removed malukenho/docheader dependency and related scripts
LICENSE	Updated copyright holder to "Respect Project Contributors"
REUSE.toml	Added REUSE configuration for license compliance
LICENSES/*.txt	Added license text files for MIT, MPL-2.0, and CC-BY-4.0
.docheader	Removed obsolete docheader configuration
.github/workflows/*.yml	Added SPDX headers to workflow files
docs/**/*.md	Added SPDX headers in HTML comment format
data/postal-code.php	Updated copyright attribution and added new postal code patterns
data/domain/**/*.php	Updated copyright attribution from generic to Mozilla Foundation
aliases.php	Updated to SPDX format with contributor attribution

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[henriquemoody]

I think we don't need to add this to all files, just the files that are really ours, that are part of the library. That would not include the documentation files, though.

[henriquemoody]

I don't think this belongs in this namespace

[alganet]

Where would you put it?

[henriquemoody]

Since we're using that to handle the Content, I think this should be part of the content. You would then not even have a prependSpdxToContent, you would just do something like:

- $content = new Content();
+ $content = $file->content->extractSpdxHeader();

[alganet]

I was not able to make this work in a single method.

There are changes to $lines that occour outside of the Content class. For example, in ValidatorHeaderLinter:

        while (($line = array_shift($lines)) !== false) {
            if (preg_match('/^(# .+|- .+|)$/', $line) === 0) {
                array_unshift($lines, $line);
                break;
            }
        }

I could not make it a single method because of it.

So, I definitely can move the methods to Content, but I was not able to make it a single clean API without further extensive refactorings.

Perhaps I didn't understood your idea or I'm missing something. If that's the case, can you clarify it?

[henriquemoody]

Yeah, I'm not a big fan of those changes outside the Content, but I decided to be less picky with it since we don't ship this code. You can merge as is. I was trying to make this a bit better, but I don't know how much better it is since we're making changes outside the Content as you pointed out.

[alganet]

Nice, thanks for the diff! I decided to apply it because it leads to less lines of code.

[henriquemoody]

Resolved the comments about the Markdown files. I had a conversation with @alganet, and he made me realize that it's as important to add that to the documentation files as to the code.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 298 out of 1090 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.