Add pydantic support

[asvetlov]

What do these changes do?

yarl.URL could be used in pydantic models without a boilrplate.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

The change doesn't break any existing code but helps with URL serialization/deserialization of pydantic models if the library was installed by user.

Related issue number

None

Checklist

• [x ] I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1607 will degrade performances by 25.46%

_{Comparing asvetlov:pydantic (941eb6d) with master (383b159)}

Summary

❌ 1 (👁 1) regression
✅ 98 untouched

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
👁	test_quote_query_string	74.2 µs	99.5 µs	-25.46%

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.95238% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 99.37%. Comparing base (383b159) to head (941eb6d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
yarl/_url.py	45.45%	1 Missing and 11 partials ⚠️

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (97.63%) is below the target coverage (100.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1607      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.57%   99.37%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          29       30       +1     
  Lines        5877     5940      +63     
  Branches      266      282      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits         5852     5903      +51     
- Misses         21       22       +1     
- Partials        4       15      +11     

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	99.37% <80.95%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
MyPy	97.63% <67.74%> (-0.32%)	⬇️
OS-Linux	99.73% <97.61%> (-0.08%)	⬇️
OS-Windows	98.66% <19.04%> (-0.83%)	⬇️
OS-macOS	98.80% <19.04%> (-0.88%)	⬇️
Py-3.10.11	98.63% <19.04%> (-0.83%)	⬇️
Py-3.10.19	99.65% <95.23%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-3.11.14	99.65% <95.23%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-3.11.9	98.63% <19.04%> (-0.83%)	⬇️
Py-3.12.10	98.63% <19.04%> (-0.83%)	⬇️
Py-3.12.12	99.65% <95.23%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-3.13.11	99.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-3.13.11t	99.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-3.14.2	99.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-3.14.2t	99.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
Py-pypy3.10.16-7.3.19	99.31% <95.23%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
VM-macos-latest	98.80% <19.04%> (-0.88%)	⬇️
VM-ubuntu-latest	99.73% <97.61%> (-0.08%)	⬇️
VM-windows-latest	98.66% <19.04%> (-0.83%)	⬇️
pytest	99.75% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[bdraco]

LGTM.

I'll look at fixing the CI later today

[bdraco]

CI is fixed. The failures are legitimate build issues with this PR now.

[bdraco]

the macos / windows 3.13t tests are failing because of the 5m timeout and there are no pydantic wheels for those archs so it has to build them

[asvetlov]

Let's run pydantic tests for Linux only on CI, it should be enough