Skip to content

Conversation

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR updates protobuf version to 3.25.5, and protobuf & jackson maven dependencies in KVM hypervisor plugin.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 16.23%. Comparing base (750290b) to head (66b7503).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.20   #12389      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     16.23%   16.23%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    13378    13376       -2     
============================================
  Files          5657     5657              
  Lines        498932   498932              
  Branches      60552    60552              
============================================
- Hits          81016    81003      -13     
- Misses       408882   408901      +19     
+ Partials       9034     9028       -6     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests 17.09% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates protobuf to version 3.25.5 and adds explicit Jackson and protobuf dependency declarations to manage transitive dependency versions effectively.

  • Adds protobuf version property (3.25.5) and dependency management entries to enforce version consistency across the project
  • Adds explicit Jackson dependencies to the KVM hypervisor plugin to ensure proper library availability
  • Adds jackson-dataformat-cbor to the utils module

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
pom.xml Adds protobuf version property (3.25.5) and dependency management for protobuf-java and protobuf-java-util to override older versions pulled by mysql-connector-java
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/pom.xml Adds explicit Jackson dependencies (core, annotations, databind, datatype-jsr310, module-jaxb-annotations) needed for JSON processing in the KVM plugin
utils/pom.xml Adds jackson-dataformat-cbor dependency to support CBOR (Concise Binary Object Representation) data format

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

this is marked for kvm but it looks like it will need full regression testing for all platforms.

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16302

@nvazquez
Copy link
Contributor

nvazquez commented Jan 8, 2026

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15148)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 50068 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr12389-t15148-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (EL8 mgmt + EL8 KVM, Ubuntu22 mgmt + Ubuntu22 KVM, EL8 mgmt + VMware 7.0u3, EL9 mgmt + XCP-ng 8.2 ) has been kicked to run smoke tests

Copy link
Contributor

@nvazquez nvazquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15152)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 53982 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr12389-t15152-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15153)
Environment: kvm-ubuntu22 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server u22
Total time taken: 57128 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr12389-t15153-kvm-ubuntu22.zip
Smoke tests completed. 141 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15154)
Environment: vmware-70u3 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 62000 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr12389-t15154-vmware-70u3.zip
Smoke tests completed. 139 look OK, 2 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
ContextSuite context=TestClusterDRS>:setup Error 0.00 test_cluster_drs.py
test_deploy_more_vms_than_limit_allows Error 140.68 test_deploy_vms_in_parallel.py

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15155)
Environment: xcpng82 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol9
Total time taken: 76001 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr12389-t15155-xcpng82.zip
Smoke tests completed. 136 look OK, 5 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_01_add_primary_storage_disabled_host Error 15.33 test_primary_storage.py
test_01_primary_storage_iscsi Error 0.14 test_primary_storage.py
test_01_primary_storage_nfs Error 0.13 test_primary_storage.py
ContextSuite context=TestStorageTags>:setup Error 0.22 test_primary_storage.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store Error 12.51 test_snapshots.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store Error 12.51 test_snapshots.py
test_01_deploy_vm_on_specific_host Error 0.06 test_vm_deployment_planner.py
test_04_deploy_vm_on_host_override_pod_and_cluster Error 0.08 test_vm_deployment_planner.py
test_08_migrate_vm Error 0.05 test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_migrate_vm_strict_tags_success Error 0.17 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_02_migrate_vm_strict_tags_failure Error 0.19 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_01_restore_vm_strict_tags_success Error 0.16 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_02_restore_vm_strict_tags_failure Error 0.19 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_01_scale_vm_strict_tags_success Error 0.14 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_02_scale_vm_strict_tags_failure Error 0.17 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_01_deploy_vm_on_specific_host_without_strict_tags Error 0.14 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_02_deploy_vm_on_any_host_without_strict_tags Error 3.38 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_03_deploy_vm_on_specific_host_with_strict_tags_success Error 0.15 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_04_deploy_vm_on_any_host_with_strict_tags_success Error 5.45 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py
test_05_deploy_vm_on_specific_host_with_strict_tags_failure Failure 0.16 test_vm_strict_host_tags.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants