Skip to content

docs: PPE+U pricing model for creators#2235

Merged
marcel-rbro merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
docs/ppe-plus-creator-facing
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

docs: PPE+U pricing model for creators#2235
marcel-rbro merged 9 commits intomasterfrom
docs/ppe-plus-creator-facing

Conversation

@VojtaKai
Copy link
Contributor

@VojtaKai VojtaKai commented Feb 10, 2026

Developer facing documentation for PPE+U


Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only change; no runtime, API, or pricing logic is modified.

Overview
Adds a new "Pass platform usage to users" section to the pay_per_event.mdx monetization docs, documenting the Pay per event + usage toggle that charges users for both PPE events and underlying platform usage.

Includes a caution callout about reduced pricing transparency and an illustrative screenshot of the toggle UI.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit e48241f. Configure here.

@VojtaKai VojtaKai self-assigned this Feb 10, 2026
@VojtaKai VojtaKai requested a review from TC-MO as a code owner February 10, 2026 13:57
@VojtaKai VojtaKai requested a review from marcel-rbro February 10, 2026 13:57
@github-actions github-actions bot added the t-c&c Team covering store and finance matters. label Feb 10, 2026
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit e48241f and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

@VojtaKai VojtaKai requested a review from stetizu1 February 10, 2026 14:04
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit 9890891 and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

Copy link
Contributor

@TC-MO TC-MO left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some changes requested:

  • Cleaned up the language for conciseness and directness
  • Used bold instead of backticks for UI elements (Pay per event + usage -> Pay per event + usage) per style guide
  • Replaced "clicking" and "toggle button" - per Microsoft style guide, use "turn on/turn off" for toggles, and "toggle button" is redundant
  • Made caution admonition text more specific ("This pricing model" -> "Charging platform usage separately")

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
If you have difficulty estimating event prices and want to avoid negative profit margins, pass the platform usage costs directly to your users. With this option enabled, users pay for both the defined events and the underlying platform usage.
If you cannot accurately estimate event prices upfront and want to avoid negative profit margins, you can pass the platform usage costs directly to users. Users then pay both the defined events and the underlying platform usage.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
:::caution Less transparent pricing
:::caution Reduced pricing transparency

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
This pricing model is less transparent for users. Disable this option once you determine accurate event pricing.
Charging platform usage separately is less transparent for users. Turn off this option once you determine accurate event pricing.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Enable this option by clicking the `Pay per event + usage` toggle button.
Turn on the **Pay per event + usage** toggle to enable this option.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
To disable this option, change your pricing model to include accurate event costs and switch off the toggle button.
To stop passing platform usage to users, update your pricing model and turn off the **Pay per event + usage** toggle.

@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit 63d713a3 and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

@VojtaKai VojtaKai requested a review from TC-MO February 11, 2026 12:23
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit c0da9a0a and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Optionally, you can pass costs associated with the platform usage to the users. [Learn more](../../../platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pay-per-event#pass-platform-usage-to-users)
You can optionally [pass platform usage costs to users](/platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pay-per-event#pass-platform-usage-to-users).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will not apply this because it reiterates the title of the info message

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My issue is mainly that the link is on [Learn more]. You can just move the link to "pass the costs":

Suggested change
Optionally, you can pass costs associated with the platform usage to the users. [Learn more](../../../platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pay-per-event#pass-platform-usage-to-users)
Optionally, you can [pass costs associated with the platform usage](../../../platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pay-per-event#pass-platform-usage-to-users)
to the users.```

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

applied

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
:::info Pass platform usage to users
:::info Pass platform usage costs to users

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

applied

Comment on lines 36 to 37
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extra blank line

Suggested change

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd just keep this simple without formatiing.

Suggested change
_Profit calculation_: `profit = (0.8 * revenue)`
Profit calculation: `profit = (0.8 * revenue)`

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

applied

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@VojtaKai VojtaKai requested a review from marcel-rbro February 16, 2026 10:57
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit 2f9539aa and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

@stetizu1 stetizu1 requested review from mhamas and removed request for honzajavorek February 16, 2026 12:20
Copy link
Contributor

@stetizu1 stetizu1 Feb 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems a bit too mild. User should not do this for "Actor Q score" but mainly for the pricing transparency.
Maybe something like

Charging platform usage separately is less transparent for users and may discourage them from using your Actor.  This also negatively impacts your [**Actor quality score**](I would add a link here, not everyone know what it is). Turn off this option once you determine accurate event pricing.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like this suggestion. I felt like something was missing, too. - may discourage them from using your Actor this is it.

## Pass platform usage to users

If you cannot accurately estimate event prices upfront and want to avoid negative profit margins, you can pass the platform usage costs directly to users. Users then pay for both the defined events and the underlying platform usage.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would add something like

This is useful during initial development or when testing pricing strategies, but should be temporary.

as introduction to warning below

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't like this sentence this much. Not sure what "update pricing model" here is.

I think Use the Pay per event + usage toggle to enable or disable this option in ... (pricing flow?... or something similar would be fine there.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pricing model should have referred to the PPE+U because it charges users differently than regular PPE but maybe it's unnecessarily adding a new term which only brings confusion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@VojtaKai VojtaKai requested a review from stetizu1 February 17, 2026 11:21
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit 1416420e and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

Copy link
Contributor

@stetizu1 stetizu1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 👍 Looks good

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit b02b1473 and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit f4c2fd39 and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

Copy link
Contributor

@marcel-rbro marcel-rbro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@marcel-rbro marcel-rbro merged commit 48b5ee2 into master Feb 18, 2026
13 checks passed
@marcel-rbro marcel-rbro deleted the docs/ppe-plus-creator-facing branch February 18, 2026 10:50
@apify-service-account
Copy link

Preview for this PR was built for commit be006b37 and is ready at https://pr-2235.preview.docs.apify.com!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-c&c Team covering store and finance matters.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

Comments