docs: PPE+U pricing model for creators#2235
Conversation
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
TC-MO
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some changes requested:
- Cleaned up the language for conciseness and directness
- Used bold instead of backticks for UI elements (Pay per event + usage -> Pay per event + usage) per style guide
- Replaced "clicking" and "toggle button" - per Microsoft style guide, use "turn on/turn off" for toggles, and "toggle button" is redundant
- Made caution admonition text more specific ("This pricing model" -> "Charging platform usage separately")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| If you have difficulty estimating event prices and want to avoid negative profit margins, pass the platform usage costs directly to your users. With this option enabled, users pay for both the defined events and the underlying platform usage. | |
| If you cannot accurately estimate event prices upfront and want to avoid negative profit margins, you can pass the platform usage costs directly to users. Users then pay both the defined events and the underlying platform usage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| :::caution Less transparent pricing | |
| :::caution Reduced pricing transparency |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| This pricing model is less transparent for users. Disable this option once you determine accurate event pricing. | |
| Charging platform usage separately is less transparent for users. Turn off this option once you determine accurate event pricing. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Enable this option by clicking the `Pay per event + usage` toggle button. | |
| Turn on the **Pay per event + usage** toggle to enable this option. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| To disable this option, change your pricing model to include accurate event costs and switch off the toggle button. | |
| To stop passing platform usage to users, update your pricing model and turn off the **Pay per event + usage** toggle. |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Optionally, you can pass costs associated with the platform usage to the users. [Learn more](../../../platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pay-per-event#pass-platform-usage-to-users) | |
| You can optionally [pass platform usage costs to users](/platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pay-per-event#pass-platform-usage-to-users). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will not apply this because it reiterates the title of the info message
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My issue is mainly that the link is on [Learn more]. You can just move the link to "pass the costs":
| Optionally, you can pass costs associated with the platform usage to the users. [Learn more](../../../platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pay-per-event#pass-platform-usage-to-users) | |
| Optionally, you can [pass costs associated with the platform usage](../../../platform/actors/publishing/monetize/pay-per-event#pass-platform-usage-to-users) | |
| to the users.``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| :::info Pass platform usage to users | |
| :::info Pass platform usage costs to users |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Extra blank line
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd just keep this simple without formatiing.
| _Profit calculation_: `profit = (0.8 * revenue)` | |
| Profit calculation: `profit = (0.8 * revenue)` |
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems a bit too mild. User should not do this for "Actor Q score" but mainly for the pricing transparency.
Maybe something like
Charging platform usage separately is less transparent for users and may discourage them from using your Actor. This also negatively impacts your [**Actor quality score**](I would add a link here, not everyone know what it is). Turn off this option once you determine accurate event pricing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I really like this suggestion. I felt like something was missing, too. - may discourage them from using your Actor this is it.
| ## Pass platform usage to users | ||
|
|
||
| If you cannot accurately estimate event prices upfront and want to avoid negative profit margins, you can pass the platform usage costs directly to users. Users then pay for both the defined events and the underlying platform usage. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would add something like
This is useful during initial development or when testing pricing strategies, but should be temporary.
as introduction to warning below
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't like this sentence this much. Not sure what "update pricing model" here is.
I think Use the Pay per event + usage toggle to enable or disable this option in ... (pricing flow?... or something similar would be fine there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pricing model should have referred to the PPE+U because it charges users differently than regular PPE but maybe it's unnecessarily adding a new term which only brings confusion.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
Developer facing documentation for PPE+U
Note
Low Risk
Documentation-only change; no runtime, API, or pricing logic is modified.
Overview
Adds a new "Pass platform usage to users" section to the
pay_per_event.mdxmonetization docs, documenting thePay per event + usagetoggle that charges users for both PPE events and underlying platform usage.Includes a caution callout about reduced pricing transparency and an illustrative screenshot of the toggle UI.
Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit e48241f. Configure here.