Skip to content

Conversation

@meyer9
Copy link
Contributor

@meyer9 meyer9 commented Jan 15, 2026

Test harness depends on base-client-node which creates a dependency cycle when trying to import base-flashblocks from base-client-engine (flashblocks -> client-node -> client-engine -> flashblocks).

This moves the test harness, benches, and e2e tests to flashblocks-node. We could technically keep benches and e2e tests in flashblocks since e2e tests and benches are technically a separate crate, but that's kinda confusing and looks like a circular dependency. Makes more sense to just all the testing/benching stuff in flashblocks-node.

@cb-heimdall
Copy link
Collaborator

cb-heimdall commented Jan 15, 2026

✅ Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 1/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 1
Sum 2

@meyer9 meyer9 force-pushed the meyer9/move-test-harness-to-flashblocks-node branch 5 times, most recently from c67e665 to 27008dd Compare January 15, 2026 17:08
@meyer9 meyer9 force-pushed the meyer9/move-test-harness-to-flashblocks-node branch from 27008dd to f8989f8 Compare January 15, 2026 17:35
@meyer9 meyer9 marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2026 17:47
@meyer9 meyer9 requested review from danyalprout and refcell January 15, 2026 17:47
@meyer9 meyer9 enabled auto-merge January 15, 2026 18:05
Copy link
Contributor

@refcell refcell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes sense to me per discussion in slack

@meyer9 meyer9 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0d4797d Jan 15, 2026
15 checks passed
@meyer9 meyer9 deleted the meyer9/move-test-harness-to-flashblocks-node branch January 15, 2026 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants