⚡️ Speed up method PrComment.to_json by 127% in PR #1104 (augmented-optimizations)
#1171
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1104
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
augmented-optimizations.📄 127% (1.27x) speedup for
PrComment.to_jsonincodeflash/github/PrComment.py⏱️ Runtime :
2.13 milliseconds→940 microseconds(best of250runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 126% speedup (2.13ms → 940μs) through three key performance improvements:
1. LRU Cache for
humanize_runtime(Primary Impact)The addition of
@lru_cache(maxsize=1024)tohumanize_runtimedramatically reduces repeated computation costs. The line profiler shows the original version spent 81.5% of its time inhumanize.precisedelta(), which is now cached. This optimization is particularly effective when:test_to_json_independent_calls: 73.1μs → 14.5μs → 10.2μs → 9.14μs on successive calls)to_jsonmethod is called repeatedly with similar dataKey test improvements:
test_to_json_with_precomputed_test_report: 2830% faster (56.4μs → 1.92μs) - demonstrates the cache's impact when humanize_runtime is called repeatedlytest_to_json_independent_calls: Shows progressive speedup as cache warms up2. Dictionary Comprehension in
get_test_pass_fail_report_by_typeReplacing the loop-based dictionary construction with a single comprehension reduces the initialization overhead from 53.1% to being computed inline. This eliminates repeated dictionary allocations and lookups during iteration over
TestTypeenum values.Test impact:
test_large_scale_benchmark_details_and_large_precomputed_report_performance_limits: Shows benefits with large datasets (40.5μs → 44.3μs includes other factors, but comprehension helps reduce overhead)3. Optimized Report Table Construction in
PrComment.to_jsonThe optimized version calls
get_test_pass_fail_report_by_type()once, stores it inraw_report, then filters it in a separate loop. This avoids callingtest_type.to_name()for every item during dictionary comprehension construction, reducing the calls toto_name()and associated overhead.Test improvements demonstrating combined effects:
test_to_json_with_benchmark_details: 410% faster (74.4μs → 14.6μs)test_to_json_without_benchmark_details: 409% faster (73.3μs → 14.4μs)test_to_json_performance_with_large_precomputed_report: 2401% faster (60.1μs → 2.40μs)Why It's Faster
humanize.precisedelta) is now memoizedhumanize_runtime()results are stored in local variables before dictionary construction, ensuring cache hits and avoiding inline calls during dict buildingThe optimization is particularly effective for:
All optimizations preserve exact output behavior while significantly reducing CPU time and memory churn.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1104-2026-01-25T11.38.15and push.