Skip to content

Conversation

@2bndy5
Copy link
Collaborator

@2bndy5 2bndy5 commented Jan 30, 2026

Seems to be related to changes in lint rules for Rust v1.93. See unnecessary_unwrap lint rule.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved internal error handling in GitHub REST API integration by using more robust pattern matching and default value strategies. No changes to end-user functionality or behavior.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Seems to be related to changes in lint rules for Rust v1.93.
See [`unnecessary_unwrap`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/rust-1.93.0/index.html#unnecessary_unwrap) lint rule.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Walkthrough

Refactored error handling in the GitHub REST API module by replacing direct unwrap() calls with pattern matching for repository binding and using unwrap_or_default() for SHA retrieval, improving code safety while maintaining existing control flow behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub REST API Error Handling
cpp-linter/src/rest_api/github/mod.rs
Refactored get_list_of_changed_files to use pattern matching (let Some(repo)) instead of is_some() with unwrap, changed SHA retrieval from unwrap() to unwrap_or_default(), and simplified URL construction with the bound repo variable.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested labels

rust

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'style: adhere to new clippy lint warning' accurately summarizes the main change—addressing a new Clippy lint warning (unnecessary_unwrap) introduced in Rust v1.93.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-clippy-warning

Tip

🧪 Unit Test Generation v2 is now available!

We have significantly improved our unit test generation capabilities.

To enable: Add this to your .coderabbit.yaml configuration:

reviews:
  finishing_touches:
    unit_tests:
      enabled: true

Try it out by using the @coderabbitai generate unit tests command on your code files or under ✨ Finishing Touches on the walkthrough!

Have feedback? Share your thoughts on our Discord thread!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@cpp-linter/src/rest_api/github/mod.rs`:
- Line 133: The code currently uses self.sha.clone().unwrap_or_default(), which
silently supplies an empty SHA and can produce invalid commit URLs; change this
to either assert presence or return an error: replace unwrap_or_default() with
unwrap() or expect("missing SHA for non-PR commit URL") to fail fast when SHA
must exist, or match on self.sha (e.g., if let Some(sha) = &self.sha { ... }
else { return Err(...) }) to explicitly handle the None case; also make the
treatment consistent with the other usage that does self.sha.clone().unwrap() so
both code paths either validate/expect SHA or both defensively return an error.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.04%. Comparing base (4c4abbb) to head (c71e6b2).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #255      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.88%   97.04%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines        3118     3078      -40     
==========================================
- Hits         3021     2987      -34     
+ Misses         97       91       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@2bndy5 2bndy5 merged commit 3c2dde9 into main Jan 30, 2026
65 checks passed
@2bndy5 2bndy5 deleted the fix-clippy-warning branch January 30, 2026 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants