Skip to content

Conversation

@lutter
Copy link
Collaborator

@lutter lutter commented Jan 9, 2026

Nextest's process-per-test model is not well suited for how our tests work since it requires that database connectiosn are set up for every test in a test suite, rather than just once per suite. Running tests with nextest is actually quite a bit slower than just using cargo test

@lutter lutter force-pushed the lutter/no-nextest branch 2 times, most recently from cf4c81f to d106ebb Compare January 13, 2026 18:06
@lutter lutter marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2026 19:29
@lutter lutter force-pushed the lutter/no-nextest branch from d106ebb to 67b6e24 Compare January 13, 2026 19:29
Copy link
Contributor

@fordN fordN left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Nextest's process-per-test model is not well suited for how our tests work
since it requires that database connectiosn are set up for every test in a
test suite, rather than just once per suite.
@lutter lutter force-pushed the lutter/no-nextest branch from 67b6e24 to dace628 Compare January 20, 2026 20:04
@lutter lutter merged commit dace628 into master Jan 20, 2026
@lutter lutter deleted the lutter/no-nextest branch January 20, 2026 20:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants