Implement new paste.debian.net API

[formorer]

Sorry for breaking that tool. I implemented a new REST API and added that to grml-paste. I also let autoflake8 running, which caused some whitespace changes. This will fix #15

[mika]

@formorer thanks a lot! Could you please rebase your PR on current master so #17 is included and doesn't break the build (sorry for that!)?

[mika]

% ./grml-paste | ./grml-paste add 
Usage: grml-paste [options] ACTION <args>

actions:
         add    Add paste to the server: <1.line> <2.line> ...
         del    Delete paste from server: <id>
         get    Get paste from server: <id>
    getlangs    Get supported language highlighting types from server
        help    Print more verbose help about specific action: <action>

grml-paste: error: Please provide me with an action
Server Error: No code provided

Maybe we should clarify the actual token usage also in normal ./grml-paste output, and also where to get that one from? (I'd assume it's not obvious for everyone that this requires an Salsa account?)

BTW, I guess we should upload this towards Debian stable for inclusion with next trixie point-release also, WDYT, @formorer?

[formorer]

I added some docs. Since grml-paste doesn't work anymore I would recommend updating it or ask for removal.

[crpb]

fwiw, currently tinkering on some features.

• return plain url (e.g. paste.d.n/plainh/XXXXX) - ./grml-paste -p[--plain] add
• write ~/.paste_history (or however it could be called) with ID, Digest and if the TTL is returned this aswell.
  • this could also make a grml-paste history feature possible to list/access those easily with an automatic deletion of "outdated" entries ( again if there is a TTL in the return )

    because it's even hard to keep track in the irc-log :P.

  • only return /plain/|/plainh/ url as the digest will be written down.

more ideas? :P

[zeha]

Where are we with this PR? Is it good to go in?

[formorer]

I would not like to enhance that issue with additional feature requests and prefer a focus on the fixes. I am however happy with new issues adressing those new features.

[zeha]

I would not like to enhance that issue with additional feature requests and prefer a focus on the fixes.

I agree, new features seem OT here.