Update `clap` Rust crates by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8409 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-02-12T00:42:12Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
clap	workspace.dependencies	patch	`4.5.57` -> `4.5.60`
clap_builder	workspace.dependencies	patch	`4.5.57` -> `4.5.60`
clap_complete	workspace.dependencies	patch	`4.5.65` -> `4.5.66`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

clap-rs/clap (clap)

`v4.5.60`

Compare Source

Fixes

(help) Quote empty default values, possible values

`v4.5.59`

Compare Source

Fixes

Command::ignore_errors no longer masks help/version on subcommands

`v4.5.58`

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-02-12T00:42:14Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 19, 2026 7:41pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 19, 2026 7:41pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 19, 2026 7:41pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 19, 2026 7:41pm

cursor · 2026-02-12T00:42:19Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Lockfile-only dependency bumps/downgrades with no direct logic changes; risk is mainly compatibility regressions on Windows from the windows-sys version shifts.

Overview
Updates the lockfile to pull in newer clap ecosystem crates: clap and clap_builder to 4.5.60, clap_complete to 4.5.66, and clap_lex to 1.0.0.

As part of dependency resolution, multiple crates now pin to older windows-sys versions (e.g., 0.60.2 -> 0.59.0, and winapi-util -> 0.48.0), changing the transitive Windows support surface.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit bdf5fc7. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-02-12T00:42:57Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This Renovate PR updates the Rust CLI dependency clap (and related crates) to the latest patch releases.

Changes:

Bumps clap and clap_builder from 4.5.57 to 4.5.58
Bumps clap_complete from 4.5.65 to 4.5.66
Updates the resolved dependency set in Cargo.lock accordingly

Technical Notes: No source-code changes are included; risk is primarily around build/runtime compatibility and should be covered by CI and any CLI argument parsing tests.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-02-12T00:46:43Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.90%. Comparing base (3c4e3d5) to head (bdf5fc7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8409      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.80%   60.90%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files        1273     1275       +2     
  Lines      124457   124848     +391     
  Branches     5357     5350       -7     
==========================================
+ Hits        75673    76039     +366     
- Misses      47900    47928      +28     
+ Partials      884      881       -3

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`7.78% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.16% <ø> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.86% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`27.20% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.86% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`81.53% <ø> (+0.20%)`	⬆️
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (+0.59%)`	⬆️
rust.hashql-hir	`89.11% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
rust.hashql-mir	`90.25% <ø> (-0.01%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-02-12T00:47:28Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 41 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

_{Comparing deps/rs/clap-rust-crates (bdf5fc7) with main (ed412f5)}

12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

github-actions · 2026-02-19T20:41:28Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.254 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.522 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.653 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.337 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.93 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.554 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.746 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.23 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.388 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.90 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.113 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.297 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$75.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.780 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$418 \mathrm{ms} \pm 932 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$94.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 447 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$85.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$281 \mathrm{ms} \pm 716 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.046 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.775 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$7.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.586 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$87.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.396 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 589 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$94.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 568 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 447 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 493 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.225 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 526 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.180 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$85.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 545 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 495 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 445 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 550 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.479 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 675 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.569 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 534 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}17.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$580 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.40 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge February 12, 2026 00:42

github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Feb 12, 2026

augmentcode bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 12, 2026 00:45 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 12, 2026 00:45 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 12, 2026 00:47 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 12, 2026 00:56 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested a review from a team February 12, 2026 01:03

hashdotai assigned TimDiekmann Feb 12, 2026

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/clap-rust-crates branch from b708276 to 1e20ad6 Compare February 16, 2026 22:52

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 16, 2026 22:55 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 16, 2026 22:55 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 16, 2026 22:56 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 16, 2026 23:06 View deployment

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/clap-rust-crates branch from 1e20ad6 to 93ef67a Compare February 17, 2026 09:26

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 17, 2026 09:28 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 17, 2026 09:29 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 17, 2026 09:30 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 17, 2026 09:37 View deployment

Update clap Rust crates

bdf5fc7

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/clap-rust-crates branch from 93ef67a to bdf5fc7 Compare February 19, 2026 19:28

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 19, 2026 19:30 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 19, 2026 19:31 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 19, 2026 19:32 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 19, 2026 19:41 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Comments

Update `clap` Rust crates#8409

Update `clap` Rust crates#8409
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/rs/clap-rust-crates

hash-worker bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 19, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Comments

Conversation

hash-worker bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v4.5.60

Fixes

v4.5.59

Fixes

v4.5.58

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 19, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

hash-worker bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`v4.5.60`

`v4.5.59`

`v4.5.58`

vercel bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading