Skip to content

Conversation

@q1blue
Copy link
Collaborator

@q1blue q1blue commented Feb 7, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 4 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/techdocs-cli/package.json

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the yarn.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Arbitrary Code Injection
SNYK-JS-BACKSTAGEPLUGINTECHDOCSNODE-15166604
  225  
high severity Directory Traversal
SNYK-JS-BACKSTAGEPLUGINTECHDOCSNODE-15166605
  149  
low severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-WEBPACK-15235959
  84  
low severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-WEBPACK-15235969
  84  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Arbitrary Code Injection
🦉 Directory Traversal
🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)


EntelligenceAI PR Summary

This PR pins Backstage dependencies to explicit versions in the techdocs-cli package, replacing workspace protocol references.

  • Changed @backstage/backend-common from workspace:^ to version 0.24.1
  • Changed @backstage/config from workspace:^ to version 0.1.1
  • Changed @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node from workspace:^ to version 1.13.11
  • Enables consistent dependency resolution and prepares package for standalone publication

@codesandbox
Copy link

codesandbox bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web EditorVS CodeInsiders

Open Preview

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @q1blue, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to enhance the security posture of the project by upgrading several core Backstage dependencies within the packages/techdocs-cli module. The updates specifically target and resolve four identified vulnerabilities, improving the overall robustness against potential security exploits.

Highlights

  • Dependency Updates: Upgraded @backstage/backend-common to 0.24.1, @backstage/config to 0.1.1, and @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node to 1.13.11 in packages/techdocs-cli/package.json.
  • Vulnerability Fixes: These dependency upgrades address four identified vulnerabilities: two high-severity issues (Arbitrary Code Injection and Directory Traversal) and two low-severity issues (Server-side Request Forgery).
Changelog
  • packages/techdocs-cli/package.json
    • Updated @backstage/backend-common from workspace:^ to 0.24.1.
    • Updated @backstage/config from workspace:^ to 0.1.1.
    • Updated @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node from workspace:^ to 1.13.11.
Activity
  • This pull request was automatically created by Snyk to address identified vulnerabilities.
  • A warning is present indicating that yarn.lock failed to update and requires manual intervention.
  • The PR description provides links to Snyk reports, documentation, and interactive lessons related to the fixed vulnerabilities.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@snyk-io
Copy link

snyk-io bot commented Feb 7, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@entelligence-ai-pr-reviews
Copy link

Walkthrough

This PR updates the dependency management strategy for the techdocs-cli package by replacing workspace protocol references with explicit version numbers. Three Backstage dependencies are pinned to specific versions: backend-common (0.24.1), config (0.1.1), and plugin-techdocs-node (1.13.11). This change transitions from workspace-relative versioning to fixed version specifications, which ensures consistent dependency resolution across different environments and is typically done in preparation for package publication or standalone distribution.

Changes

File(s) Summary
packages/techdocs-cli/package.json Updated three Backstage dependencies from workspace protocol (workspace:^) to explicit versions: @backstage/backend-common to 0.24.1, @backstage/config to 0.1.1, and @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node to 1.13.11.

Sequence Diagram

This diagram shows the interactions between components:

sequenceDiagram
    participant PM as Package Manager
    participant TechDocs as techdocs-cli
    participant BC as @backstage/backend-common
    participant Config as @backstage/config
    participant TDNode as @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node

    Note over PM,TDNode: Dependency Resolution Change (No Runtime Impact)
    
    PM->>TechDocs: Install dependencies
    
    Note over PM,BC: Previously: workspace:^<br/>Now: 0.24.1 (pinned)
    PM->>BC: Resolve version 0.24.1
    BC-->>PM: Package installed
    
    Note over PM,Config: Previously: workspace:^<br/>Now: 0.1.1 (pinned)
    PM->>Config: Resolve version 0.1.1
    Config-->>PM: Package installed
    
    Note over PM,TDNode: Previously: workspace:^<br/>Now: 1.13.11 (pinned)
    PM->>TDNode: Resolve version 1.13.11
    TDNode-->>PM: Package installed
    
    PM-->>TechDocs: Dependencies ready
    
    Note over TechDocs: Runtime behavior unchanged<br/>Only version resolution differs
Loading

▶️AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf
Install the extension

Note for Windsurf Please change the default marketplace provider to the following in the windsurf settings:

Marketplace Extension Gallery Service URL: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/_apis/public/gallery

Marketplace Gallery Item URL: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items

Entelligence.ai can learn from your feedback. Simply add 👍 / 👎 emojis to teach it your preferences. More shortcuts below

Emoji Descriptions:

  • ⚠️ Potential Issue - May require further investigation.
  • 🔒 Security Vulnerability - Fix to ensure system safety.
  • 💻 Code Improvement - Suggestions to enhance code quality.
  • 🔨 Refactor Suggestion - Recommendations for restructuring code.
  • ℹ️ Others - General comments and information.

Interact with the Bot:

  • Send a message or request using the format:
    @entelligenceai + *your message*
Example: @entelligenceai Can you suggest improvements for this code?
  • Help the Bot learn by providing feedback on its responses.
    @entelligenceai + *feedback*
Example: @entelligenceai Do not comment on `save_auth` function !

Also you can trigger various commands with the bot by doing
@entelligenceai command

The current supported commands are

  1. config - shows the current config
  2. retrigger_review - retriggers the review

More commands to be added soon.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, aims to fix security vulnerabilities by updating dependencies. However, the proposed changes are problematic for this monorepo. Specifically, it replaces workspace: specifiers with pinned versions, and critically, it downgrades @backstage/config from 1.0.8 to 0.1.1. This downgrade is very likely to break the application. I've recommended reverting these changes and manually addressing the vulnerabilities in a way that is compatible with the monorepo's structure.

Comment on lines +63 to +67
"@backstage/backend-common": "0.24.1",
"@backstage/catalog-model": "workspace:^",
"@backstage/cli-common": "workspace:^",
"@backstage/config": "workspace:^",
"@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node": "workspace:^",
"@backstage/config": "0.1.1",
"@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node": "1.13.11",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

These automated dependency updates from Snyk appear to be incorrect for this monorepo setup. Pinning versions instead of using workspace:^ can break the local development workflow and lead to inconsistencies.

Most critically, the version for @backstage/config is being downgraded from 1.0.8 to 0.1.1, which will almost certainly cause build failures or runtime errors.

The PR description also notes that it Failed to update the yarn.lock, which further indicates these changes are incomplete and require manual review.

It is strongly recommended to revert these changes. The security vulnerabilities should be addressed by correctly updating the package versions within the workspace, rather than applying these automated, and in this case incorrect, changes.

    "@backstage/backend-common": "workspace:^",
    "@backstage/catalog-model": "workspace:^",
    "@backstage/cli-common": "workspace:^",
    "@backstage/config": "workspace:^",
    "@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node": "workspace:^"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants