Draft
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Billing API integration to the Mailtrap Ruby SDK. It includes a data model for billing information, an API wrapper class, usage examples, comprehensive test coverage with VCR fixtures, and documentation updates to the changelog and README. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
actor Client
participant Mailtrap
participant BillingAPI
participant HTTP as HTTP Client
participant Server as Mailtrap Server
participant Billing as Billing Object
Client->>Mailtrap: Initialize with API key
Client->>BillingAPI: Create BillingAPI wrapper
Client->>BillingAPI: Call `#get`()
activate BillingAPI
BillingAPI->>BillingAPI: Construct base_path with account_id
BillingAPI->>HTTP: GET /api/accounts/{id}/billing/usage
deactivate BillingAPI
activate HTTP
HTTP->>Server: Send request with Authorization header
deactivate HTTP
activate Server
Server-->>HTTP: 200 OK + JSON billing data
deactivate Server
activate HTTP
HTTP-->>BillingAPI: Response received
deactivate HTTP
activate BillingAPI
BillingAPI->>Billing: Map response to Billing (Struct)
deactivate BillingAPI
Billing-->>Client: Return Billing object with usage data
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
spec/mailtrap/billing_api_spec.rb (1)
27-33: Consider simplifying the error expectation block.The block form of
raise_errorworks but could be made more concise. That said, since it intentionally tests botherror.message(string) anderror.messages(array), this is reasonable if the two accessors have distinct behavior.♻️ Optional: Simplified error assertion (if `messages` check isn't needed separately)
- it 'raises authorization error' do - expect { get }.to raise_error do |error| - expect(error).to be_a(Mailtrap::AuthorizationError) - expect(error.message).to include('Incorrect API token') - expect(error.messages.any? { |msg| msg.include?('Incorrect API token') }).to be true - end - end + it 'raises authorization error' do + expect { get }.to raise_error(Mailtrap::AuthorizationError, /Incorrect API token/) + end🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@spec/mailtrap/billing_api_spec.rb` around lines 27 - 33, The current block form of expect { get }.to raise_error can be simplified: replace the multiline block in the spec with a single matcher call like expect { get }.to raise_error(Mailtrap::AuthorizationError, /Incorrect API token/) to assert both the class and the message in one line; if you still need to assert the error.messages array, keep a short two-step assertion instead—first use expect { get }.to raise_error(Mailtrap::AuthorizationError) to capture the error, then assert on error.messages to check the array contents (refer to the raise_error matcher and the error.messages accessor used in the existing spec).
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@lib/mailtrap/billing_api.rb`:
- Line 13: The YARD `@return` tag uses angle brackets instead of YARD's required
square-bracket syntax; update the doc comment that currently reads "@return
<Billing>" to "@return [Billing]" so the return type is correctly recognized by
YARD (i.e., replace the angle brackets with square brackets in the `@return` tag).
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@spec/mailtrap/billing_api_spec.rb`:
- Around line 27-33: The current block form of expect { get }.to raise_error can
be simplified: replace the multiline block in the spec with a single matcher
call like expect { get }.to raise_error(Mailtrap::AuthorizationError, /Incorrect
API token/) to assert both the class and the message in one line; if you still
need to assert the error.messages array, keep a short two-step assertion
instead—first use expect { get }.to raise_error(Mailtrap::AuthorizationError) to
capture the error, then assert on error.messages to check the array contents
(refer to the raise_error matcher and the error.messages accessor used in the
existing spec).
| self.response_class = Billing | ||
|
|
||
| # Show billing details for the account | ||
| # @return <Billing> Billing data for account |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
YARD @return tag uses incorrect syntax.
Should use square brackets per YARD convention: @return [Billing].
📝 Proposed fix
- # `@return` <Billing> Billing data for account
+ # `@return` [Billing] Billing data for account📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| # @return <Billing> Billing data for account | |
| # `@return` [Billing] Billing data for account |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@lib/mailtrap/billing_api.rb` at line 13, The YARD `@return` tag uses angle
brackets instead of YARD's required square-bracket syntax; update the doc
comment that currently reads "@return <Billing>" to "@return [Billing]" so the
return type is correctly recognized by YARD (i.e., replace the angle brackets
with square brackets in the `@return` tag).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Changes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation