-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 688
SL Cloud Migration Update November 2025 #29477
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…ForFieldUpdate to a public procedure
…ns, and remove obsolete codeunit
|
Could not find linked issues in the pull request description. Please make sure the pull request description contains a line that contains 'Fixes #' followed by the issue number being fixed. Use that pattern for every issue you want to link. |
|
@nikolakukrika This PR is now ready for code review. Thank you. |
…te for assigning dimensions on Beginning Balance journal entries.
…nto SLMigrationUpdate2025-11
…r, and SL Batch tables to support tests.
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/test/src/SLMigrationVendor1099Tests.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/W1/HybridSL/app/src/Migration/Accounts/SLAccountMigrator.Codeunit.al
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/PageExt/SLMigrationConfigurationExt.PageExt.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/US/HybridSL_US/app/src/Codeunits/SLPopulateVendor1099Data.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…nto SLMigrationUpdate2025-11
…r message handling in migration log.
| if not IRS1099FormBox.FindFirst() then | ||
| exit(false); | ||
|
|
||
| IRS1099VendorFormBoxSetup.Validate("Period No.", Format(TaxYear)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You need to validate if IRS Reporting Period record exists before assigning the Fortmat(TaxYear) value to the "Period No." field
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added a check to validate that the IRS Reporting Period exists before assigning the Fortmat(TaxYear) value to the "Period No." field
if not IRSReportingPeriod.Get(Format(TaxYear)) then
exit(false);
| IRS1099VendorFormBoxSetup: Record "IRS 1099 Vendor Form Box Setup"; | ||
| IRS1099FormBox: Record "IRS 1099 Form Box"; | ||
| begin | ||
| IRS1099FormBox.SetRange("No.", IRS1099Code); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You need to set filter for period as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added IRS1099FormBox.SetRange("Period No.", IRSReportingPeriod."No.");
| if IRS1099FormBox.FindFirst() then | ||
| GenJournalLine.Validate("IRS 1099 Form No.", IRS1099FormBox."Form No."); | ||
|
|
||
| GenJournalLine.Validate("IRS 1099 Form Box No.", IRS1099Code); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure i understand why we only validate "IRS 1099 Form No." if IRS1099FormBox exists, but "IRS 1099 Form Box No." regardless. Should the second Validate call also be wrapper into the IF condition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refactored the code to validate the IRS 1099 Reporting Period, IRS 1099 Form No., IRS 1099 Form Box No., and IRS 1099 Reporting Amount fields if IRS1099ForBox exists.
…nto SLMigrationUpdate2025-11
…CL/ALAppExtensions into SLMigrationUpdate2025-11
Summary
SL Cloud Migration Update for November 2025
This PR replaces closed PRs 29378 and 29394.
Work Item(s)
Fixes #
AB#575741
AB#609658
AB#612598