Skip to content

Conversation

@simoll
Copy link
Collaborator

@simoll simoll commented Oct 22, 2025

  • DXIL validation tests showing correct uses pass

SM6.10 tracking bug: #7824

@V-FEXrt
Copy link
Collaborator

V-FEXrt commented Oct 24, 2025

Hey Simon!

We've actually been talking about DXIL op stuff internally that this PR is going to fall under. Specially we want a better system to mark ops as experimental before they are upgraded to stable!

I have a proposal up (microsoft/hlsl-specs#698) but due to scheduling conflicts we aren't going to be able to make a final decision until ~Nov 4th.

Since the decision there has impacts on this PR we are holding off on the review for just a little bit. I wanted to give you a heads up so you weren't surprised by the silence from our side

@V-FEXrt
Copy link
Collaborator

V-FEXrt commented Nov 12, 2025

microsoft/hlsl-specs#729

The proposal is up here, once the implementation lands the ops here will need to be renumbered. I suspect the implementation will land quite quickly

@V-FEXrt
Copy link
Collaborator

V-FEXrt commented Nov 14, 2025

Spec has been merged! I'm on vacation the next few weeks but @tex3d should be uploading the infrastructure change soon. Then this can be rebased on that

@simoll
Copy link
Collaborator Author

simoll commented Dec 1, 2025

Spec has been merged! I'm on vacation the next few weeks but @tex3d should be uploading the infrastructure change soon. Then this can be rebased on that

@tex3d What's the status of the experimental opcode infra change to unblock this PR?

@tex3d
Copy link
Contributor

tex3d commented Dec 1, 2025

@tex3d What's the status of the experimental opcode infra change to unblock this PR?

I'm trying to get a second review on this: #7947. Once merged, you can update the branch and move the intrinsic definitions in hctdb.py into experimental and update any references to the opcode numbers that changed.

Copy link
Contributor

@tex3d tex3d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that #7947 has merged, you'll need to rebase and move things to experimental ops according to the comments I made.

@tex3d
Copy link
Contributor

tex3d commented Dec 8, 2025

I believe we'll also want to reserve high-level intrinsic IDs for these ASAP. It might be good to do this in the same PR, but a separate PR for that would be ok too.

That means updates to gen_intrin_main.txt, generated files, as well as manually adding EmptyLower entries for gLowerTable in HLOperationLower.cpp for each new high-level intrinsic operation.

This could serve as a good example for how to reserve HLSL intrinsics and DXIL opcodes for a feature before it's implemented, using the new experimental DXIL op table.

@tex3d
Copy link
Contributor

tex3d commented Dec 10, 2025

I've created a PR to reserve HL and DXIL ops for these operations here: #7995.

So, you should be able to re-apply just the changes necessary on top of main when that PR merges.

@simoll
Copy link
Collaborator Author

simoll commented Dec 10, 2025

Thanks @tex3d. I'll rebase when #7995 lands

@simoll simoll changed the title [SM6.10] DXIL opcodes for ClusterID and TriangleObjectPositions [SM6.10] VEC9 TriangleObjectPositions / CHECK-pass validation tests Dec 15, 2025
@simoll simoll force-pushed the sm610_dxil_opcodes branch from b3a793f to 63a5b8b Compare December 15, 2025 05:59
@simoll simoll requested a review from tex3d December 15, 2025 06:01
Copy link
Contributor

@tex3d tex3d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this looks good, with just one concern:

The signed form of the i32 opcode is the one llvm will print and the one that will be needed in CHECK lines of tests. I think it would be best to stick to the signed form for input IR as well, so that each opcode doesn't have two textural forms to search/replace when updating ops in tests for released versions.

Copy link
Contributor

@tex3d tex3d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added suggested change comments to make updating the opcodes to canonical form easier.

@simoll simoll self-assigned this Jan 6, 2026
simoll and others added 4 commits January 6, 2026 13:05
Co-authored-by: Tex Riddell <texr@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Tex Riddell <texr@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Tex Riddell <texr@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Tex Riddell <texr@microsoft.com>
@simoll simoll requested a review from tex3d January 7, 2026 05:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: New

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants