Doc improvement - Examples using <some-method> section quirk fix #13596
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1himan
requested review from
agramfort,
dengemann,
drammock and
larsoner
as code owners
Member
|
Let's try it, thanks @1himan ! |
|
🎉 Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🥳 Looking forward to seeing more from you in the future! 💪 |
Member
|
@1himan I should have asked you to add a |
1himan
added a commit
to 1himan/mne-python
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2026
larsoner
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference issue (if any)
as discussed in https://mne.discourse.group/t/question-related-to-docs/11653/
What does this implement/fix?
Additional information
The new change in css file looks something like this:
and if we just remove the backticks, it'll look something like this:
If we want things to be simple, we can go for the latter option but IMHO the first looks good too.