Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

This commit addresses a type-safety issue in src/utils/shell.ts. A @ts-expect-error was suppressing a type error that occurred when accessing the shortMessage property of a failed execa command result. The fix introduces a type assertion to correctly inform TypeScript that when a command fails, the result object is an ExecaError, which is guaranteed to have the shortMessage property. This change improves the type safety and robustness of the code without altering its behavior. The commit also removes unrelated changes to the package-lock.json file to ensure a clean and focused pull request.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9154186724161591451 started by @serhalp

When using `execa` with the `{ reject: false }` option, the returned promise will not be rejected on failure. Instead, the resolved result object will have a `failed` property set to `true`.

In these cases, the result object is of type `ExecaError`, which contains additional properties like `shortMessage`.

This commit replaces a `@ts-expect-error` with a type assertion to correctly inform TypeScript of the result's shape in the failure case, improving type safety.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

📊 Benchmark results

Comparing with e0fe8dc

  • Dependency count: 1,052 (no change)
  • Package size: 317 MB ⬇️ 0.00% decrease vs. e0fe8dc
  • Number of ts-expect-error directives: 365 ⬇️ 0.27% decrease vs. e0fe8dc

When using `execa` with the `{ reject: false }` option, the returned promise will not be rejected on failure. Instead, the resolved result object will have a `failed` property set to `true`.

In these cases, the result object is of type `ExecaError`, which contains additional properties like `shortMessage`.

This commit replaces a `@ts-expect-error` with a type assertion to correctly inform TypeScript of the result's shape in the failure case, improving type safety.
When using `execa` with the `{ reject: false }` option, the returned promise will not be rejected on failure. Instead, the resolved result object will have a `failed` property set to `true`.

In these cases, the result object is of type `ExecaError`, which contains additional properties like `shortMessage`.

This commit replaces a `@ts-expect-error` with a type assertion to correctly inform TypeScript of the result's shape in the failure case, improving type safety.

This commit also includes updates to `package-lock.json` to ensure a consistent dependency tree and resolve CI failures.
When using `execa` with the `{ reject: false }` option, the returned promise will not be rejected on failure. Instead, the resolved result object will have a `failed` property set to `true`.

In these cases, the result object is of type `ExecaError`, which contains additional properties like `shortMessage`.

This commit replaces a `@ts-expect-error` with a type guard using the `in` operator. This allows TypeScript to correctly infer the shape of the result object in the failure case, improving type safety in a more robust and runtime-safe way than a type assertion.
@serhalp serhalp closed this Jan 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants