Skip to content

Conversation

@fALKENdk
Copy link
Contributor

@fALKENdk fALKENdk commented Dec 6, 2025

The Azure Pipelines schema requires fetchDepth to be a string, but the generator was outputting a number.
This fix changes the value to a string to match the official schema specification.

Current Behavior

The generator creates azure-pipelines.yml with fetchDepth: 0 (number), which causes YAML schema validation error because the Azure Pipelines schema expects fetchDepth to be a string.

According to the Azure Pipelines schema, fetchDepth is defined as:

"fetchDepth": {
    "description": "Depth of Git graph to fetch",
    "$ref": "#/definitions/string"
}

Expected Behavior

The generator should output fetchDepth: '0' (string) to match the schema specification and prevent validation errors.

The Azure Pipelines schema requires fetchDepth to be a string, but the generator was outputting a
number.
This fix changes the value to a string to match the official schema specification.
@fALKENdk fALKENdk requested review from a team as code owners December 6, 2025 00:18
@fALKENdk fALKENdk requested a review from jaysoo December 6, 2025 00:18
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 6, 2025

👷 Deploy request for nx-docs pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4b6c9f3

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 6, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
nx-dev Ready Ready Preview Dec 15, 2025 0:09am

@nx-cloud
Copy link
Contributor

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 8, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 4b6c9f3

Command Status Duration Result
nx affected --targets=lint,test,test-kt,build,e... ✅ Succeeded 37m 43s View ↗
nx run-many -t check-imports check-lock-files c... ✅ Succeeded 2m 25s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx-cloud conformance:check ✅ Succeeded 11s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx format:check ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx-cloud record -- nx sync:check ✅ Succeeded <1s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-12-15 14:26:13 UTC

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants