Skip to content

Conversation

@abays
Copy link
Contributor

@abays abays commented Jan 30, 2026

During a minor update, we currently mistakenly consider empty OpenStackDataPlaneNodeSets and wait for their non-existent OVN deployments to update. We should ignore them in this context instead, in order to prevent unnecessarily blocking the update and thus obviate the need for manual intervention to unblock it (which can be done by deleting the empty OpenStackDataPlaneNodeSets).

Tested locally in a CIFMW dev-scripts environment with a minor update of VA1:

  1. Added an empty OpenStackDataPlaneNodeSet after initial deployment
  2. Initiated minor update and reached data plane OVN update
  3. Observed successful completion of data plane OVN update

Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-25851

@abays abays requested review from dprince and rabi January 30, 2026 11:02
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from slagle January 30, 2026 11:02
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abays

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

"ansibleSSHPrivateKeySecret": "dataplane-ansible-ssh-private-key-secret",
},
"nodes": map[string]interface{}{},
"servicesOverride": []string{},
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed this because the servicesOverride field doesn't actually exist in OpenStackDataPlaneNodeSet. It's found in OpenStackDataPlaneDeployment instead, so this line is misleading.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant