Skip to content

Conversation

@daveshanley
Copy link
Member

I was reviewing the specs again, missed a couple of props I have not seen in the wild myself, but they should be included to be fully compliant.

$comment, contentSchema and $vocabulary

I was reviewing the specs again, missed a couple of props I have not seen in the wild myself, but they should be included to be fully compliant.

`$comment`, `contentSchema` and `$vocabulary`
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.58%. Comparing base (c3cf119) to head (c8fe000).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main     #495    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   99.58%   99.58%            
========================================
  Files         189      189            
  Lines       22476    22649   +173     
========================================
+ Hits        22383    22556   +173     
  Misses         59       59            
  Partials       34       34            
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 99.58% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@daveshanley daveshanley merged commit 9736a90 into main Dec 30, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants