Open
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Current dependencies on/for this PR: This comment was autogenerated by Freephite. |
e870c73 to
5310a52
Compare
5310a52 to
577c1d7
Compare
jackyzha0
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
I want to start enforcing max payload size before we attempt to send the messages over the wire.
Ideally we can confine these errors to be per-stream so one bad RPC call doesn't explode the entire client.
As a pre-req, we need to check for the max payload size before accepting messages into the send buffer, which means we need to encode them first to figure out the full payload size.
An additional benefit is we only ever encode messages once rather than re-encoding every time we resend messages from the send buffer. Granted, this is probably not a path we hit very often.
What changed
Versioning