Add substitute_with_block method to TextRun, that can take a block wtih access to MatchData with regex capture groups etc

[jrochkind]

I needed to do a substitute where the match arg was a regex, and if it were gsub I'd be using a block to have access to capture groups in $1 $2 $3 etc. Because of the weird way variables $1 $2 $3 are handled in ruby and block scope, I couldn't provide a delegated block to give exactly the same API as ordinary gsub. My original idea was to do that, added on to existing #substitute.

But instead, had to provide a new/alternate #substitute_block method, with a block that actually gets a MatchData object as arg, and can access whatever it needs from there, including capture groups and match string.

[jrochkind]

Hm, CI failure is weird and annoying.

bundle exec rake passes for me locally.

Any ideas what would be different on CI?

Failures:

  1) Docx::Document replacing contents should replace existing file within the document
     Failure/Error: expect(Zip::File.open(temp_file_path).read(entry_path)).to eq io.read

     Zip::Error:
       File /tmp/docx_gem[20](https://github.com/ruby-docx/docx/actions/runs/15328470377/job/43194224826?pr=161#step:4:21)250530-[21](https://github.com/ruby-docx/docx/actions/runs/15328470377/job/43194224826?pr=161#step:4:22)39-2luizi.docx not found
     # ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/rubyzip-2.4.1/lib/zip/file.rb:112:in `initialize'
     # ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/rubyzip-2.4.1/lib/zip/file.rb:129:in `new'
     # ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/rubyzip-2.4.1/lib/zip/file.rb:129:in `open'
     # ./spec/docx/document_spec.rb:523:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
     # ./spec/docx/document_spec.rb:5[22](https://github.com/ruby-docx/docx/actions/runs/15328470377/job/43194224826?pr=161#step:4:23):in `open'
     # ./spec/docx/document_spec.rb:522:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'

Finished in 1.71 seconds (files took 0.5[23](https://github.com/ruby-docx/docx/actions/runs/15328470377/job/43194224826?pr=161#step:4:24)19 seconds to load)
136 examples, 1 failure

Failed examples:

rspec ./spec/docx/document_spec.rb:515 # Docx::Document replacing contents should replace existing file within the document

The failed test is NOT my new test, but an existing test... don't understand how this PR could cause it to break... is my new test somehow resulting in deletion of a file? But why wouldn't that reproduce locally?

docx/spec/docx/document_spec.rb

Lines 515 to 536 in 1a51b4e

	describe 'replacing contents' do
	let(:replacement_file_path) { @fixtures_path + '/replacement.png' }
	let(:temp_file_path) { Tempfile.new(['docx_gem', '.docx']).path }
	let(:entry_path) { 'word/media/image1.png' }
	let(:doc) { Docx::Document.open(@fixtures_path + '/replacement.docx') }
	it 'should replace existing file within the document' do
	File.open replacement_file_path, 'rb' do |io|
	doc.replace_entry entry_path, io.read
	end
	doc.save(temp_file_path)
	File.open replacement_file_path, 'rb' do |io|
	expect(Zip::File.open(temp_file_path).read(entry_path)).to eq io.read
	end
	end
	after do
	File.delete(temp_file_path) if File.exist?(temp_file_path)
	end
	end

Any advice?

[satoryu]

The CI failure sometimes happens only on GitHub Actions. I reran the tests, and all of them passed.

[jrochkind]

thank you!