Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
@jasonbosco can we merge this? |
jasonbosco
reviewed
Aug 11, 2025
jasonbosco
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2025
Member
|
Thanks @excid3! |
Member
|
Released in v4.0.0 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change Summary
This removes the Oj gem and replaces it with
jsonwhich is what comes with Ruby.Ruby 3.0 ships with json 2.5.1: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/ruby_3_0/ext/json/lib/json/version.rb
Ruby 3.4 ships with json 2.9.1: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/ruby_3_4/ext/json/lib/json/version.rb
Rails relies on
jsonas well.This removes a dependency, plus Oj is known to have some issues. The json gem's performance has been greatly improved recently by byroot. See this series of blog posts: https://byroot.github.io/ruby/json/2024/12/15/optimizing-ruby-json-part-1.html
PR Checklist